News
November 06, 2025
Vote 1 Annabel Crabb’s new ABC show? If only it had a little more sauce...
The three-part series is all very wholesome, but does anyone really want to see how the democracy sausage gets made?
Annabel Crabb, beloved for her witty political commentary and culinary prowess, is back on ABC with a new three-part series exploring the inner workings of Australian democracy. While the show promises a wholesome and insightful look behind the scenes, some viewers are left wanting a bit more spice.
The series, fronted by the ever-charming Crabb, delves into the processes and people that shape our nation's political landscape. It aims to demystify the often complex world of parliament, policies, and power plays. However, the question being asked is whether the show's approach is perhaps *too* gentle.
The metaphor embedded in the description, "does anyone really want to see how the democracy sausage gets made?" speaks volumes. It suggests that while the series offers a glimpse into the machinery of democracy, it might shy away from the messier, more contentious aspects. Just as the creation of a democracy sausage – a staple at Australian polling booths – involves more than just sausages, bread, and onions, democracy itself is a multifaceted process with heated debates, compromises, and sometimes, even a little bit of political maneuvering that might be considered unappetizing.
The show's wholesome nature is undeniable. It presents a generally positive and optimistic view of Australian politics. But for some, this might feel like a sanitised version of reality. Viewers accustomed to Crabb's sharp wit and willingness to tackle tough issues might find themselves yearning for a deeper dive, a more critical analysis, and perhaps a touch more irreverence.
While the series undoubtedly provides valuable insights into the mechanisms of government, the absence of a truly critical edge leaves a lingering question: is it truly reflecting the full, often gritty, reality of Australian democracy? Or is it presenting a slightly palatable, overly simplified version, leaving viewers craving a little more "sauce" to truly savour the experience? Ultimately, the show’s success will depend on whether its audience is satisfied with a wholesome overview or desires a more substantial and potentially controversial exploration of the democratic process.
The series, fronted by the ever-charming Crabb, delves into the processes and people that shape our nation's political landscape. It aims to demystify the often complex world of parliament, policies, and power plays. However, the question being asked is whether the show's approach is perhaps *too* gentle.
The metaphor embedded in the description, "does anyone really want to see how the democracy sausage gets made?" speaks volumes. It suggests that while the series offers a glimpse into the machinery of democracy, it might shy away from the messier, more contentious aspects. Just as the creation of a democracy sausage – a staple at Australian polling booths – involves more than just sausages, bread, and onions, democracy itself is a multifaceted process with heated debates, compromises, and sometimes, even a little bit of political maneuvering that might be considered unappetizing.
The show's wholesome nature is undeniable. It presents a generally positive and optimistic view of Australian politics. But for some, this might feel like a sanitised version of reality. Viewers accustomed to Crabb's sharp wit and willingness to tackle tough issues might find themselves yearning for a deeper dive, a more critical analysis, and perhaps a touch more irreverence.
While the series undoubtedly provides valuable insights into the mechanisms of government, the absence of a truly critical edge leaves a lingering question: is it truly reflecting the full, often gritty, reality of Australian democracy? Or is it presenting a slightly palatable, overly simplified version, leaving viewers craving a little more "sauce" to truly savour the experience? Ultimately, the show’s success will depend on whether its audience is satisfied with a wholesome overview or desires a more substantial and potentially controversial exploration of the democratic process.
Category:
Entertainment