News
October 01, 2025
The peril of politicising judicial appointments
OPINION: Workplace Relations Minister Brooke van Velden has rightly been criticised over her claim that the Employment Relations Authority members believed “money grows on trees”.
Workplace Relations Minister Brooke van Velden is facing scrutiny following comments perceived as politicising the role of the Employment Relations Authority (ERA). The controversy stems from a statement made by the Minister suggesting that members of the ERA held the belief that “money grows on trees.” This remark has ignited debate about the appropriate level of political commentary on independent judicial bodies and the potential erosion of public trust in the impartiality of the ERA.
The Employment Relations Authority plays a crucial role in resolving employment disputes in New Zealand. As an independent body, it is tasked with making fair and impartial decisions based on evidence and legal precedent. The perception of political interference or bias can severely undermine its effectiveness and the confidence that employers and employees have in the fairness of the system.
Critics argue that Minister van Velden's statement, regardless of its intent, creates the impression that the government expects the ERA to align with its fiscal policies. This raises concerns that ERA members might feel pressured to prioritize cost-cutting over equitable resolutions in employment disputes, potentially compromising their independence.
The specific context surrounding the Minister's statement remains a point of contention. However, the broader issue highlights the delicate balance between political accountability and the need to protect the independence of the judiciary. While ministers are entitled to comment on policy and the overall performance of government agencies, it is crucial that such commentary avoids casting doubt on the impartiality and integrity of individual judicial officers or the bodies they serve.
Legal experts have weighed in on the matter, emphasizing the importance of maintaining a clear separation between the executive and judicial branches of government. They caution that unsubstantiated claims or perceived attempts to influence judicial decision-making can erode public trust in the rule of law and undermine the principles of natural justice. The debate surrounding Minister van Velden's comments serves as a reminder of the constant vigilance required to safeguard the independence of New Zealand's judicial institutions.
The Employment Relations Authority plays a crucial role in resolving employment disputes in New Zealand. As an independent body, it is tasked with making fair and impartial decisions based on evidence and legal precedent. The perception of political interference or bias can severely undermine its effectiveness and the confidence that employers and employees have in the fairness of the system.
Critics argue that Minister van Velden's statement, regardless of its intent, creates the impression that the government expects the ERA to align with its fiscal policies. This raises concerns that ERA members might feel pressured to prioritize cost-cutting over equitable resolutions in employment disputes, potentially compromising their independence.
The specific context surrounding the Minister's statement remains a point of contention. However, the broader issue highlights the delicate balance between political accountability and the need to protect the independence of the judiciary. While ministers are entitled to comment on policy and the overall performance of government agencies, it is crucial that such commentary avoids casting doubt on the impartiality and integrity of individual judicial officers or the bodies they serve.
Legal experts have weighed in on the matter, emphasizing the importance of maintaining a clear separation between the executive and judicial branches of government. They caution that unsubstantiated claims or perceived attempts to influence judicial decision-making can erode public trust in the rule of law and undermine the principles of natural justice. The debate surrounding Minister van Velden's comments serves as a reminder of the constant vigilance required to safeguard the independence of New Zealand's judicial institutions.
Category:
Politics