News
September 12, 2025
Kurds of Iran in the crosshairs of imperialism — from Khomeini to Trump
Iran under the mullahs has seen several waves of mass protest, each put down with extreme violence, writes Sarah Glynn.
**Kurds of Iran Face Unrelenting Pressure Under Shifting Geopolitical Winds**
Iran's Kurdish population has long endured a precarious existence, caught between the country's central government and the shifting sands of international politics. From the reign of Ayatollah Khomeini to the era of Donald Trump, the Kurds' struggle for autonomy and cultural recognition has consistently been met with repression, as documented by Sarah Glynn.
Glynn's analysis highlights a recurring pattern in Iran's history under the Islamic Republic: periods of widespread public discontent followed by brutal crackdowns. The Kurds, often at the forefront of these movements, have consistently borne the brunt of the regime's heavy hand. Their aspirations for greater self-governance, coupled with their distinct cultural identity, have made them a target for the authorities, who view any expression of Kurdish identity as a threat to national unity.
The article points to a history punctuated by mass protests, each instance met with extreme violence. While Glynn doesn't specify the exact details of each protest, the implication is clear: the Iranian government has shown a willingness to use force to quell dissent, particularly in Kurdish regions. This suppression extends beyond physical violence, encompassing restrictions on cultural expression, language rights, and political participation.
The reference to "imperialism" in the title suggests a complex interplay of external forces influencing the situation. While the article itself doesn't explicitly define what imperialistic forces are involved, it implies that the Kurds' plight is exacerbated by the broader geopolitical landscape. The mention of Trump specifically hints at the impact of U.S. foreign policy, particularly sanctions and heightened tensions between the U.S. and Iran, on the Kurdish community. These external pressures can destabilize the region and provide the Iranian government with a pretext to further suppress dissent under the guise of national security.
The article serves as a stark reminder of the enduring challenges faced by the Kurds in Iran. Their struggle for recognition and self-determination persists, overshadowed by internal repression and the complexities of international power dynamics. Glynn's observations underscore the urgent need for international attention to the plight of the Iranian Kurds and a more nuanced understanding of the factors contributing to their ongoing hardship.
Iran's Kurdish population has long endured a precarious existence, caught between the country's central government and the shifting sands of international politics. From the reign of Ayatollah Khomeini to the era of Donald Trump, the Kurds' struggle for autonomy and cultural recognition has consistently been met with repression, as documented by Sarah Glynn.
Glynn's analysis highlights a recurring pattern in Iran's history under the Islamic Republic: periods of widespread public discontent followed by brutal crackdowns. The Kurds, often at the forefront of these movements, have consistently borne the brunt of the regime's heavy hand. Their aspirations for greater self-governance, coupled with their distinct cultural identity, have made them a target for the authorities, who view any expression of Kurdish identity as a threat to national unity.
The article points to a history punctuated by mass protests, each instance met with extreme violence. While Glynn doesn't specify the exact details of each protest, the implication is clear: the Iranian government has shown a willingness to use force to quell dissent, particularly in Kurdish regions. This suppression extends beyond physical violence, encompassing restrictions on cultural expression, language rights, and political participation.
The reference to "imperialism" in the title suggests a complex interplay of external forces influencing the situation. While the article itself doesn't explicitly define what imperialistic forces are involved, it implies that the Kurds' plight is exacerbated by the broader geopolitical landscape. The mention of Trump specifically hints at the impact of U.S. foreign policy, particularly sanctions and heightened tensions between the U.S. and Iran, on the Kurdish community. These external pressures can destabilize the region and provide the Iranian government with a pretext to further suppress dissent under the guise of national security.
The article serves as a stark reminder of the enduring challenges faced by the Kurds in Iran. Their struggle for recognition and self-determination persists, overshadowed by internal repression and the complexities of international power dynamics. Glynn's observations underscore the urgent need for international attention to the plight of the Iranian Kurds and a more nuanced understanding of the factors contributing to their ongoing hardship.
Category:
World