News
September 06, 2025
The $61 takeaway lunch that just proves lobster is overrated
The price tag didn’t seem to deter the punters eagerly lining up for it at the US Open. But I want my money back.
## The $61 takeaway lunch that just proves lobster is overrated
NEW YORK – At the US Open, amidst the thrilling tennis matches and buzzing crowds, one takeaway lunch item is causing quite a stir – and not necessarily for the right reasons. Priced at a hefty $61, this lobster-centric offering has drawn long lines of eager customers, intrigued by the promise of a luxurious courtside dining experience. However, for at least one disillusioned patron, the reality failed to live up to the hype, leading to a resounding declaration: lobster is overrated.
The exorbitant price tag alone raises eyebrows. In a city known for its diverse and often affordable culinary options, a $61 takeaway meal demands exceptional quality and an unforgettable taste experience. While lobster, a symbol of culinary indulgence, often commands a premium, the question remains: does this US Open offering justify the cost?
According to one disgruntled customer, the answer is a resounding no. While the allure of enjoying a lobster lunch while watching world-class tennis is undeniable, the actual experience left much to be desired. The customer, whose identity remains anonymous, expressed disappointment, stating that the meal simply wasn't worth the investment. They felt the taste and quality of the lobster didn’t justify the hefty price tag, leading them to feel ripped off.
This individual's experience highlights a potential disconnect between the perceived value of lobster and the actual culinary experience. While the shellfish is often associated with luxury and extravagance, its flavor can be easily masked or overshadowed by poor preparation or substandard ingredients. A poorly executed lobster dish, regardless of its price, can leave a lasting impression of disappointment.
The high demand for the $61 lobster lunch at the US Open suggests that many attendees are willing to pay a premium for the experience of indulging in a high-end meal while enjoying the tournament. However, this single negative review serves as a cautionary tale, reminding consumers that price is not always indicative of quality. It also raises a larger question about the perceived value of lobster itself – is it truly a culinary delicacy worth the often-exorbitant price, or is it simply an overhyped ingredient resting on its reputation? For at least one customer at the US Open, the answer is clear: they want their money back.
NEW YORK – At the US Open, amidst the thrilling tennis matches and buzzing crowds, one takeaway lunch item is causing quite a stir – and not necessarily for the right reasons. Priced at a hefty $61, this lobster-centric offering has drawn long lines of eager customers, intrigued by the promise of a luxurious courtside dining experience. However, for at least one disillusioned patron, the reality failed to live up to the hype, leading to a resounding declaration: lobster is overrated.
The exorbitant price tag alone raises eyebrows. In a city known for its diverse and often affordable culinary options, a $61 takeaway meal demands exceptional quality and an unforgettable taste experience. While lobster, a symbol of culinary indulgence, often commands a premium, the question remains: does this US Open offering justify the cost?
According to one disgruntled customer, the answer is a resounding no. While the allure of enjoying a lobster lunch while watching world-class tennis is undeniable, the actual experience left much to be desired. The customer, whose identity remains anonymous, expressed disappointment, stating that the meal simply wasn't worth the investment. They felt the taste and quality of the lobster didn’t justify the hefty price tag, leading them to feel ripped off.
This individual's experience highlights a potential disconnect between the perceived value of lobster and the actual culinary experience. While the shellfish is often associated with luxury and extravagance, its flavor can be easily masked or overshadowed by poor preparation or substandard ingredients. A poorly executed lobster dish, regardless of its price, can leave a lasting impression of disappointment.
The high demand for the $61 lobster lunch at the US Open suggests that many attendees are willing to pay a premium for the experience of indulging in a high-end meal while enjoying the tournament. However, this single negative review serves as a cautionary tale, reminding consumers that price is not always indicative of quality. It also raises a larger question about the perceived value of lobster itself – is it truly a culinary delicacy worth the often-exorbitant price, or is it simply an overhyped ingredient resting on its reputation? For at least one customer at the US Open, the answer is clear: they want their money back.
Category:
World