News
September 22, 2025
Biden's NIH allowed experiments that implanted animals with pieces of aborted human fetuses, watchdog group claims
The NIH under the Biden administration funded dozens of studies that involved research on animals using human tissue from aborted fetuses, a new investigation claims.
**Biden's NIH Allowed Experiments That Implanted Animals with Pieces of Aborted Human Fetuses, Watchdog Group Claims**
Washington D.C. – A watchdog group is raising concerns over the National Institutes of Health (NIH) under President Biden’s leadership, alleging that the agency has funded numerous research projects involving the implantation of animals with tissue derived from aborted human fetuses. The group claims its investigation uncovered dozens of studies utilizing this practice.
The allegations center around the NIH's funding of research where animals, often mice and rats, are implanted with human fetal tissue. This practice, known as fetal tissue research, has been a subject of ethical debate for decades. Proponents argue that it offers invaluable insights into human development and disease, potentially leading to treatments and cures for conditions like Alzheimer's, Parkinson's, and spinal cord injuries. Opponents, however, raise moral and ethical objections related to abortion and the use of fetal tissue.
The watchdog group's claims highlight a potentially controversial aspect of the Biden administration's science policy. While the specific details of the studies remain unclear, such research typically involves transplanting fetal tissue into animals to study its behavior and interaction within a living organism. This can allow scientists to observe how human cells develop and function in a controlled environment, providing data that would be difficult or impossible to obtain through other means.
The investigation’s findings are expected to reignite the long-standing debate surrounding fetal tissue research, particularly concerning the source of the tissue and the ethical implications of its use. Critics have long argued that using tissue from elective abortions incentivizes the procedure, a claim disputed by researchers who emphasize the importance of the research for advancing medical knowledge.
The NIH has yet to release an official statement responding directly to the watchdog group's claims. However, the agency has historically defended its support for fetal tissue research, arguing that it is conducted under strict ethical guidelines and oversight. These guidelines typically involve obtaining informed consent from the donor and ensuring that the research adheres to all applicable federal and state laws.
The controversy surrounding this issue is likely to intensify as more details of the specific studies funded by the NIH emerge. It raises fundamental questions about the balance between scientific progress, ethical considerations, and the moral implications of using human fetal tissue in medical research. The debate is expected to involve bioethicists, policymakers, and the public, prompting a re-evaluation of the guidelines and regulations governing fetal tissue research in the United States.
Washington D.C. – A watchdog group is raising concerns over the National Institutes of Health (NIH) under President Biden’s leadership, alleging that the agency has funded numerous research projects involving the implantation of animals with tissue derived from aborted human fetuses. The group claims its investigation uncovered dozens of studies utilizing this practice.
The allegations center around the NIH's funding of research where animals, often mice and rats, are implanted with human fetal tissue. This practice, known as fetal tissue research, has been a subject of ethical debate for decades. Proponents argue that it offers invaluable insights into human development and disease, potentially leading to treatments and cures for conditions like Alzheimer's, Parkinson's, and spinal cord injuries. Opponents, however, raise moral and ethical objections related to abortion and the use of fetal tissue.
The watchdog group's claims highlight a potentially controversial aspect of the Biden administration's science policy. While the specific details of the studies remain unclear, such research typically involves transplanting fetal tissue into animals to study its behavior and interaction within a living organism. This can allow scientists to observe how human cells develop and function in a controlled environment, providing data that would be difficult or impossible to obtain through other means.
The investigation’s findings are expected to reignite the long-standing debate surrounding fetal tissue research, particularly concerning the source of the tissue and the ethical implications of its use. Critics have long argued that using tissue from elective abortions incentivizes the procedure, a claim disputed by researchers who emphasize the importance of the research for advancing medical knowledge.
The NIH has yet to release an official statement responding directly to the watchdog group's claims. However, the agency has historically defended its support for fetal tissue research, arguing that it is conducted under strict ethical guidelines and oversight. These guidelines typically involve obtaining informed consent from the donor and ensuring that the research adheres to all applicable federal and state laws.
The controversy surrounding this issue is likely to intensify as more details of the specific studies funded by the NIH emerge. It raises fundamental questions about the balance between scientific progress, ethical considerations, and the moral implications of using human fetal tissue in medical research. The debate is expected to involve bioethicists, policymakers, and the public, prompting a re-evaluation of the guidelines and regulations governing fetal tissue research in the United States.
Category:
Politics